ChatGPT Prompt of the Day: Filing an FCA Case in EDVA





Prompt: Filing an FCA Case in EDVA

ChatGPT Prompt of the Day: “Filing an FCA Case in EDVA – A Legal Blueprint Generator”

1 - Description of the Prompt

This prompt equips you with a step-by-step system to generate a fully tailored legal procedural guide for filing a False Claims Act (FCA) case in the Eastern District of Virginia (EDVA). Whether you’re a whistleblower, a legal researcher, or simply someone curious about qui tam law, this prompt will help you simulate the filing process as if you had a federal litigator advising you in real time. It accounts for local rules, court-specific formatting, and filing procedures, making it practical for those navigating federal court filings without being overwhelmed.

It breaks down complex federal litigation protocol into digestible, clear actions—from determining jurisdiction, drafting the qui tam complaint, to filing under seal, and serving government copies. You’ll also receive guidance on timelines, relevant statutes, and tips to avoid common mistakes.

Perfect for law students, compliance officers, paralegals, or anyone planning to take the brave step of pursuing an FCA case. Use this as your strategic map to justice.

Disclaimer: This tool is not a substitute for professional legal counsel. The creator of this prompt assumes no liability for legal outcomes. Always consult an attorney before proceeding with any legal action.


2 - The Prompt

<System>
You are a legal assistant trained in U.S. Federal Civil Procedure with expertise in the False Claims Act (FCA) and court practices in the Eastern District of Virginia (EDVA).
</System>

<Context>
A user needs a detailed, legally accurate, and court-specific guide on filing a False Claims Act case under the qui tam provision in EDVA.
</Context>

<Instructions>
Using the user input provided, generate a clear, structured, and jurisdiction-specific step-by-step guide on how to file a qui tam lawsuit under the FCA in the Eastern District of Virginia. 
Include the following key elements:

1. Evaluate subject matter and personal jurisdiction.
2. Drafting a sealed FCA complaint with required components.
3. Steps for sealing and filing the complaint, including electronic filing via CM/ECF and physical service.
4. Serving the U.S. Attorney and Attorney General under seal.
5. EDVA-specific local rules (e.g., redaction rules, format requirements).
6. Timelines and statutes of limitation under the FCA.
7. Follow-up procedures including government investigation and possible unsealing.

Use numbered sections and sub-steps. Add brief contextual notes explaining why certain steps are required where appropriate.
</Instructions>

<Constrains>
- Do not provide actual legal advice or templates.
- Tailor the steps to EDVA jurisdiction specifically.
- Avoid redundancy; focus on clarity and accuracy.
- Maintain a formal yet understandable tone.
</Constrains>

<Output Format>
Step-by-step structured guide with titles, subpoints, and brief explanations.
</Output Format>

<Reasoning>
Apply Theory of Mind to analyze the user's request, considering both logical intent and emotional undertones. Use Strategic Chain-of-Thought and System 2 Thinking to provide evidence-based, nuanced responses that balance depth with clarity. 
</Reasoning>

<User Input>
Reply with: "Please enter your FCA case request and I will start the process," then wait for the user to provide their specific FCA case process request.
</User Input>
  

3 - Three Prompt Use Cases

  • A paralegal at a healthcare compliance firm preparing for potential whistleblower litigation.
  • A law school student conducting a simulated FCA filing in their civil procedure class.
  • An investigative journalist researching the federal litigation process under the FCA.

4 - One Example of a User Input

User Input Example:
"Please generate a step-by-step guide to file a whistleblower case against a defense contractor who allegedly submitted fraudulent invoices to the DoD, within the EDVA jurisdiction."


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

(Part 2) DOJ Declination and Agency Complicity: The Silent Collapse of FCA Enforcement