"THE RIGHT TO ARRIVE ALIVE"
ROOT TRUTH: The greatest source of unnecessary death on Earth is human-operated vehicles.
BRANCH ONE: The Dreamwalker Case (Narcolepsy and the Hidden Millions)
You say I shouldn’t drive because I fall asleep unpredictably.
But I drove — in a Tesla — with Full Self-Driving.
I filmed myself simulating sleep. Sunglasses on.
The car didn't panic. The car didn't swerve. The car didn’t kill anyone.
It stayed in lane. It followed traffic. It outperformed human attention.
“The car watched the road when I couldn’t — and that’s what kept us all alive.”
There are millions of us:
Narcoleptics
Epileptics
Diabetics with crashes in blood sugar
PTSD and anxiety drivers
Single parents exhausted at the wheel
Insomniacs
Overnight workers
This is not a niche.
This is a massive hidden population who are told we’re too risky to drive — or we drive anyway and people die.
But now, the tech exists.
And it works.
BRANCH TWO: THE SYSTEMIC FAILURE TO LIBERATE SAFETY
Let’s be brutally clear.
Withholding Full Self-Driving from every vehicle is an act of negligent systemic homicide.
If FSD reduces collisions…
If FSD outperforms human reaction times…
If FSD never drives drunk, distracted, or emotionally compromised…
Then keeping it locked behind paywalls, premiums, and patents is no longer a business choice — it is a crime against the commons.
There is no moral logic in requiring human drivers in every car.
The logic of life-saving technology is:
deploy everywhere or be complicit in every death it could have prevented.
BRANCH THREE: THE NEW MORAL CONTRACT — ELECTIVE HUMAN DRIVING
Imagine a world where Full Self-Driving is the default — and human driving is the exception.
Driving becomes an opt-in risk.
You want to drive manually? You must:
Log the intent.
Sign off on the liability.
Prove sobriety and awareness.
Consent to tracking of decisions during the drive.
Because let’s face it: humans are the least reliable component in every crash.
FSD doesn’t get road rage. It doesn’t text. It doesn’t cry while driving home from a breakup.
“To be blunt: the greatest threat on the road is you. And we now have the tech to make that threat optional.”
BRANCH FOUR: UNIVERSAL DEPLOYMENT AS A MATTER OF PLANETARY JUSTICE
Deploying FSD in every vehicle is not a luxury upgrade — it’s infrastructure for survival.
Just as:
Airbags became standard.
Seat belts became mandatory.
Anti-lock brakes were regulated.
Now, Full Self-Driving must become universal by law, not selective by wealth.
Every life has equal value.
Every street has equal stakes.
So why is safety being sold as a feature?
“To profit off the prevention of death is to tax life itself.”
BRANCH FIVE: WHAT THE FUTURE WILL SAY
The future will not ask:
“Did we make enough margin off our software?”
The future will ask:
“How many lives did we let burn because we feared releasing the cure too early?”
Just like vaccines. Just like fire alarms. Just like clean water.
“We will look back at this moment and ask:
Why the hell didn’t we make the machine drive?”
CLOSING THE OPENING: THE SACRED TRUTH
We do not demand FSD be released for profit.
We demand it be released for public survival.
We do not ask for favors.
We deliver judgment:
To withhold Full Self-Driving from the world when it is proven to save lives is a moral abomination.
We will not allow human error to be a permanent feature of transportation when safer code exists.
This is not a Tesla issue. This is a species issue.
Choose now:
Release it as standard.
Or answer for every avoidable death that follows.