Financial strain has major impact on patients' healthcare decisions, research shows (Archive #1: May 18, 2018)

-

 Link to original post

Financial strain has major impact on patients' healthcare decisions, research shows

To combat the reluctance to discuss financial strain, physicians should take the lead in recognizing and "diagnosing" financial strain.

Financial strain is the single most important factor in making healthcare decisions for low-income individuals, who often forgo care in favor of basic needs such as food and rent, researchers in UT Southwestern's Center for Patient-Centered Outcomes Research found.


In addition, low-income individuals are often reluctant or too embarrassed to discuss their financial hardships and constraints with caregivers during office visits. As a result, physicians and caregivers frequently misinterpret that choice as noncompliance with medical care.

"Financial strain is the burden that prevents many low-income patients from being able to take better care of themselves," said lead author Oanh Nguyen, MD, assistant professor of internal medicine and clinical sciences at UT Southwestern Medical Center. "This financial strain can cause nonadherence to physician recommendations that appear to reflect a patient's lack of engagement in care. However, this 'nonadherence' is actually the result of rational and difficult trade-offs to cope with financial strain."

To combat the reluctance to discuss financial strain, physicians should take the lead in recognizing and "diagnosing" financial strain, the authors recommended.

"We believe our findings will help physicians better recognize the signs and symptoms of financial strain in patients," Nguyen said, "so that they can create a safe environment for patients to overcome their embarrassment by discussing these concerns and work with their patients to develop the best plan of care that works within the patient's financial means. For instance, discussing which medications cost more or less and which are safe to skip or stretch if necessary."

Researchers conducted 12 focus groups among individuals seeking services at Crossroads Community Services, a local nonprofit organization providing food assistance and other support to low-income families in Dallas. Most participants were in their 40s and 50s. Sixty-seven percent were women, 5 percent were white, 38 percent were black, and 56 percent were Hispanic.

Next steps include development of analytic algorithms to help healthcare teams recognize when an individual may be unable to adhere to medical recommendations due to the presence of financial strain and other unmet basic needs.





Twitter: @JELagasse Email the writer: jeff.lagasse@himssmedia.com

Top Posts

The Price of a Life: Why We Should Allow the Sale of Kidneys

-
Image
Organ transplantation stands as one of modern medicine's most miraculous frontiers, offering renewed hope and extended life for millions. Yet, this beacon of hope is dimmed by the uncomfortable reality that the demand for organs far exceeds supply. Kidneys, in particular, are in overwhelming scarcity, driving a critical and immediate need for innovative solutions. This brings us to a controversial, often-taboo subject that is ripe for ethical exploration—allowing individuals to sell one of their kidneys. To some, the very idea of monetizing a part of the human body is repugnant. However, as we'll explore in this opinion piece, there are compelling arguments in favor of kidney sales under a regulated, ethical framework. It is a move that I assert can not only help in saving lives but can also empower individuals and alleviate the burden on healthcare systems. Current State: An Organ Dearth and Unmet Need The grim backdrop of the current state of organ donation is the massive gap...
Read more

The Unseen Health War: Why We Must Rally Behind MHPAEA's Proposed Rule Changes

-
Image
The human mind, an intangible yet omnipresent entity, defines the very essence of our existence. In recognition of this unassailable truth, the Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act (MHPAEA) was enacted in 2008, a landmark legislation that underscored the importance of equitable mental healthcare access. However, a decade and a half later, MHPAEA’s legacy of promise remains similarly obscured, as patients with mental health and substance use disorders continue to succumb to a silent health crisis, shadowed by stigma and structural obstacles within the healthcare system. The MHPAEA, in its original paradigm, laid the groundwork for non-discriminatory insurance coverage for mental health and substance use disorder treatment, setting forth a tapestry of regulations to safeguard patient rights. Yet, even amidst its first implementing steps, the Act faced criticism for its ambiguity and lack of robust enforcement. This has culminated in a mosaic of covert insurance practices that pe...
Read more

The Imperative of Extending Healthcare to All Immigrants: A Matter of Ethics, Economics, and Public Health

-
Image
The ongoing debate about extending healthcare to all immigrants often centers on ethical, economic, and public health considerations. As we navigate this complex issue, it is crucial to ground our discussions in evidence-based arguments. Ethical Considerations At its core, healthcare is a fundamental human right , not a privilege contingent on immigration status. Denying healthcare based on this status is a form of discrimination that contradicts the principle of universal human dignity. As healthcare professionals, we have a duty of care to all individuals, regardless of their immigration status. This duty aligns with the ethical principles of fairness and justice, which demand equal access to healthcare. Economic Implications Contrary to common misconceptions, providing healthcare to immigrants can lead to significant economic benefits . For instance, preventive care for immigrants can reduce long-term healthcare costs . The cost of treating advanced diseases is often higher than p...
Read more